Deep Conical Implants
Providing a tight implant-abutment seal
and
Superior implant-abutment rigidity
Deep Conical
Implants
Providing a tight implant-abutment seal
and superior implant-abutment rigidity
Deep Conical Implants
Providing a tight implant-abutment seal
and superior implant-abutment rigidity
The Deep Conical Implant Solution
The Deep Conical (DC) dental implant system offers practitioners a dental implant with state-of-the-art design and featuring the proven internal cone connection system.
–
Deep Conical
Connection
Providing a tight
implant-abutment seal
–
Double Hex Anti-rotation
Providing 16 different
prosthetic seating
orientations
–
Co-Axis® Enabled
Angled prosthetic
platform correction
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
High Strength
Titanium
Enables exceptional fatigue
strength functionality
–
Microthreads
To distribute the
load in the critical
cortical region
–
Built-in Platform Shift
For more optimal
aesthetics
Deep Conical Connection
Providing a tight
implant-abutment seal
Double Hex Anti-rotation
Providing 16 different
prosthetic seating
orientations
Co-Axis® Enabled
Angled prosthetic
platform correction
High Strength Titanium
Enables exceptional
fatigue strength
functionality
Microthreads
To distribute the
load in the critical
cortical region
Built-in Platform Shift
For more optimal
aesthetics
The new DCR50 implant range
A ⌀5.0 mm implant incorporating a ⌀4.0 mm prosthetic platform.
The DCR50 range comprises of 2 implant lengths (6 and 8 mm), making it an ideal solution for resorbed alveolar ridges in the posterior region.
The new DCR50 implant range
A ⌀5.0 mm implant incorporating a ⌀4.0 mm prosthetic platform.
The DCR50 range comprises of 2 implant lengths (6 and 8 mm), making it an ideal solution for resorbed alveolar ridges in the posterior region.
Technical Facts
- Available in lengths ranging from 6 – 15 mm
- Available in diameters: ⌀3 mm, ⌀3.5 mm, ⌀4 mm and ⌀5 mm
- Co-Axis® enabled: available in a 12° angulation variation
- SInergy surface: surface roughened by alumina-blasting giving a moderately rough surface with over 20 years of evidence of clinical success
- Pure high strength grade 4 titanium enables exceptional fatigue strength (>920 MPa)
- Available in tapered and cylindrical body shapes
Surgical Benefits
- Co-Axis® enabled: available in a 12° angulation variation
- SInergy moderately rough surface with over 20 years of clinical research showing consistently excellent results
- Pure high strength titanium enables exceptional fatigue strength (>920 MPa)
- Excellent tactile sensibility during placement
- Microthreads to distribute the load in the critical cortical region
- Highly effective self-tapping thread enabling fast insertion and excellent primary stability
Prosthetic Benefits
- Double hex anti-rotation providing 16 different prosthetic seating orientations
- 11° internal conical connection interface provides a tight implant-abutment seal and superior implant-abutment rigidity
- Built-in platform shift for more optimal aesthetics
- Wide range of prosthetic options for treatment of single tooth, partial or full edentulism
Catalogues and Brochures
Instructions For Use (IFU)
Documents
References
Glibert, M., Matthys, C., Maat, R.J., De Bruyn, H. and Vervaeke, S., 2018. A randomized controlled clinical trial assessing initial crestal bone remodeling of implants with a different surface roughness. Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 20(5), pp.824-828.
Glibert, M., Vervaeke, S., Jacquet, W., Vermeersch, K., Östman, P.O. and De Bruyn, H., 2018. A randomized controlled clinical trial to assess crestal bone remodeling of four different implant designs. Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 20(4), pp.455-462.
Vandeweghe S, Hawker P, De Bruyn H. An Up to 12-Year Retrospective Follow-Up on Immediately Loaded, Surface-Modified Implants in the Edentulous Mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Apr;18(2):323-31.
Vandeweghe S, Ferreira D, Vermeersch L, Mariën M, De Bruyn H. Long-term retrospective follow-up of turned and moderately rough implants in the edentulous jaw. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Apr;27(4):421-6.