TRI-NEX® Implants

 

 

An internal trilobe design

for

Predictability during implant placement and prosthetic fit

TRI-NEX®
Implants

An internal tri-lobe design

for predictability during

implant placement and prosthetic fit

TRI-NEX® Implants

An internal tri-lobe design

for predictability during

implant placement and prosthetic fit

The TRI-NEX® Implant Solution

Conventional internal trilobe interfaces are not suited to withstand high force during implant insertion and can be deformed.

Southern’s TRI-NEX® dental implants feature a trilobe connection with an additional internal hexagon for implant insertion. This design allows the primary driving forces for implant insertion on the hex, protecting the integrity of the lobes for prosthetic fit during restorative procedures.

The coronal wall at the top of the implant features a bevelled edge creating a forced ‘platform switch’ for prosthetic components. The unique design of the TRI-NEX® implant addresses the requirements needed for achieving reliable and predictable results.

Trilobe Hex Drive Connection

Allowing higher insertion
torque without damaging
the prosthetic interface

TRI-MAX® Enabled

For immediate molar
replacement therapies

Built-in Platform Shift

Bevelled edge
creating forced
‘platform switching’

High Strength
Titanium

Enables exceptional
fatigue strength
functionality

Co-Axis® Enabled

Angled prosthetic
platform correction

SInergy Surface

Alumina-blasted surface
with over 20 years
of clinical results

Tri-lobe Hex Drive Connection

Allowing higher insertion
torque without damaging
the prosthetic interface

TRI-MAX® Enabled

For immediate molar
replacement therapies

Built-in Platform Shift

Bevelled edge
creating forced
‘platform switching’

High Strength Titanium

Enables exceptional
fatigue strength
functionality

Co-Axis® Enabled

Angled prosthetic
platform correction

SInergy Surface

Alumina-blasted surface
with over 20 years
of clinical results

Technical Facts
  • Available in lengths ranging from 7 – 16 mm
  • Available in diameters:
    • Standard implants: ⌀3.5 mm, ⌀4.3 mm, ⌀5 mm and ⌀6 mm
    • MAX implants: ⌀7 mm, ⌀8 mm and ⌀9 mm
  • Co-Axis® enabled: available in a 12° angulation variation
  • Available in tapered and cylindrical body shapes
  • SInergy surface: surface roughened by alumina-blasting giving a moderately rough surface with over 20 years of evidence of clinical success
  • Pure high strength grade 4 titanium enables exceptional fatigue strength (>920 MPa)
  • A smooth machined bevelled implant collar (0.8 mm) provides a built-in platform shift
  • Implant insertion tools available for both standard and Co-Axis® implants
  • Prosthetic components are compatible with UniGrip drivers
Surgical Benefits
  • Co-Axis® enabled: available in a 12° angulation variation
  • MAX implants available in 7.0 mm, 8.0 mm and 9.0 mm diameters
  • SInergy moderately rough surface with over 20 years of clinical research showing consistently excellent results
  • Pure high strength titanium enables exceptional fatigue strength (>920 MPa)
  • Tri-lobe hex drive connection with an additional internal hexagon for implant insertion allowing higher insertion torque without damaging the tri-lobe interface
Prosthetic Benefits
  • Widest range of prosthetic options for treatment of single tooth, partial or full edentulism
  • 12° Co-Axis® provide the ideal prosthetic platform for screw-retained restorations
  • A smooth machined bevelled implant collar provides a built-in platform shift
  • Tri-lobe hex drive connection with an additional internal hexagon for implant insertion allowing higher insertion torque without damaging the tri-lobe interface
References
Prasad, K.D., Shetty, M., Bansal, N. and Hegde, C., 2011. Platform switching: An answer to crestal bone loss. Journal of Dental Implants, 1(1), p.13.

Vandeweghe S, Hawker P, De Bruyn H. An Up to 12-Year Retrospective Follow-Up on Immediately Loaded, Surface-Modified Implants in the Edentulous Mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Apr;18(2):323-31.

Vandeweghe S, Ferreira D, Vermeersch L, Mariën M, De Bruyn H. Long-term retrospective follow-up of turned and moderately rough implants in the edentulous jaw. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Apr;27(4):421-6