TRI-NEX® Implants
An internal trilobe design
for
Predictability during implant placement and prosthetic fit
TRI-NEX®
Implants
An internal tri-lobe design
for predictability during
implant placement and prosthetic fit
TRI-NEX® Implants
An internal tri-lobe design
for predictability during
implant placement and prosthetic fit
The TRI-NEX® Implant Solution
Conventional internal trilobe interfaces are not suited to withstand high force during implant insertion and can be deformed.
Southern’s TRI-NEX® dental implants feature a trilobe connection with an additional internal hexagon for implant insertion. This design allows the primary driving forces for implant insertion on the hex, protecting the integrity of the lobes for prosthetic fit during restorative procedures.
The coronal wall at the top of the implant features a bevelled edge creating a forced ‘platform switch’ for prosthetic components. The unique design of the TRI-NEX® implant addresses the requirements needed for achieving reliable and predictable results.
–
Trilobe Hex Drive Connection
Allowing higher insertion
torque without damaging
the prosthetic interface
–
TRI-MAX® Enabled
For immediate molar
replacement therapies
–
Built-in Platform Shift
Bevelled edge
creating forced
‘platform switching’
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
High Strength
Titanium
Enables exceptional
fatigue strength
functionality
–
Co-Axis® Enabled
Angled prosthetic
platform correction
–
SInergy Surface
Alumina-blasted surface
with over 20 years
of clinical results
Tri-lobe Hex Drive Connection
Allowing higher insertion
torque without damaging
the prosthetic interface
TRI-MAX® Enabled
For immediate molar
replacement therapies
Built-in Platform Shift
Bevelled edge
creating forced
‘platform switching’
High Strength Titanium
Enables exceptional
fatigue strength
functionality
Co-Axis® Enabled
Angled prosthetic
platform correction
SInergy Surface
Alumina-blasted surface
with over 20 years
of clinical results
Technical Facts
- Available in lengths ranging from 7 – 16 mm
- Available in diameters:
- Standard implants: ⌀3.5 mm, ⌀4.3 mm, ⌀5 mm and ⌀6 mm
- MAX implants: ⌀7 mm, ⌀8 mm and ⌀9 mm
- Co-Axis® enabled: available in a 12° angulation variation
- Available in tapered and cylindrical body shapes
- SInergy surface: surface roughened by alumina-blasting giving a moderately rough surface with over 20 years of evidence of clinical success
- Pure high strength grade 4 titanium enables exceptional fatigue strength (>920 MPa)
- A smooth machined bevelled implant collar (0.8 mm) provides a built-in platform shift
- Implant insertion tools available for both standard and Co-Axis® implants
- Prosthetic components are compatible with UniGrip drivers
Surgical Benefits
- Co-Axis® enabled: available in a 12° angulation variation
- MAX implants available in 7.0 mm, 8.0 mm and 9.0 mm diameters
- SInergy moderately rough surface with over 20 years of clinical research showing consistently excellent results
- Pure high strength titanium enables exceptional fatigue strength (>920 MPa)
- Tri-lobe hex drive connection with an additional internal hexagon for implant insertion allowing higher insertion torque without damaging the tri-lobe interface
Prosthetic Benefits
- Widest range of prosthetic options for treatment of single tooth, partial or full edentulism
- 12° Co-Axis® provide the ideal prosthetic platform for screw-retained restorations
- A smooth machined bevelled implant collar provides a built-in platform shift
- Tri-lobe hex drive connection with an additional internal hexagon for implant insertion allowing higher insertion torque without damaging the tri-lobe interface
Catalogues and Brochures
Instructions For Use (IFU)
Documents
References
Vandeweghe S, Hawker P, De Bruyn H. An Up to 12-Year Retrospective Follow-Up on Immediately Loaded, Surface-Modified Implants in the Edentulous Mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Apr;18(2):323-31.
Vandeweghe S, Ferreira D, Vermeersch L, Mariën M, De Bruyn H. Long-term retrospective follow-up of turned and moderately rough implants in the edentulous jaw. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Apr;27(4):421-6