ILZ Mini Implant
Mini dental implants in the management
of the atrophic maxilla and mandible
The ILZ Mini Implant Solution
The use of the mini dental implants to retain complete overdentures provides an alternative treatment modality for elderly patients in the management of unretentive lower dentures. Minimally invasive dentistry is of increasing importance to the modern dentist, and where appropriate can be applied to improve denture stability and function for patients.
Unique hexagonal collar
No sharp angles for better soft tissue adaptation around neck of implant
–
Popular Co-Axis
Built in 12° angle correction above soft tissue for optimal use of available bone
–
One piece implant
Ø1.8mm ball head
–
–
High strength titanium
Grade 4 pure titanium (900 MpA) providing exceptional fatigue strength
–
Sinergy™ surface
Moderatly rough* Alumin-blasted surface for early osseointegration and longevity
–
Apical thread
Aggressive thread for maximum primary stability in trabecular bone
Unique hexagonal collar
No sharp angles for better soft tissue adaptation around neck of implant
Popular Co-Axis
Built in 12° angle correction above soft tissue for optimal use of available bone
One piece implant
Ø1.8mm ball head
High strength titanium
Grade 4 pure titanium (900 MpA) providing exceptional fatigue strength
Sinergy™ surface
Moderatly rough* Alumin-blasted surface for early osseointegration and longevity
Apical thread
Aggressive thread for maximum primary stability in trabecular bone
Technical Facts
- External Hex and Deep Conical Connections.
- 12° Co-Axis® with integrated Subcrestal Angle Correction® and Straight Implant Designs.
- Body Shifted Coronal Section vs Tapered Apical section is 50:50.
- External Hex offers 3.5 and 4.2 coronal diameters with 4.5 and 5.0mm diameter in the maximum apical section.
- External Hex uses the IBN 3.43 and IB 4.0 restorative platforms.
Surgical Benefits
- External Hex and Deep Conical Connections.
- 12° Co-Axis® with integrated Subcrestal Angle Correction® and Straight Implant Designs.
- Body Shifted Coronal Section vs Tapered Apical section is 50:50.
- External Hex offers 3.5 and 4.2 coronal diameters with 4.5 and 5.0mm diameter in the maximum apical section.
Prosthetic Benefits
- External Hex and Deep Conical Connections.
- 12° Co-Axis® with integrated Subcrestal Angle Correction® and Straight Implant Designs.
- Body Shifted Coronal Section vs Tapered Apical section is 50:50.
- External Hex offers 3.5 and 4.2 coronal diameters with 4.5 and 5.0mm diameter in the maximum apical section.
Tamsin Cracknell
With the ILZ, we can offer a less invasive, more affordable restorative alternative for patients whose morphology or preferences preclude regular implants.
Prof. Dr PO Östman
The ILZ implants are perfect for narrow full arch ridges when I plan for an overdenture. The treatment is highly effective with low cost for the patient and high satisfaction with low morbidity.
Graham Blackbeard
ILZ is a minimally invasive implant that gives significant improvement in the quality of life of elderly denture-wearing patients.
Prof. Dr Anita Visser
The future is bright for the ILZ Mini Implants; cheap, options for flapless insertion and very low surgical complications.
Prof. Craig Barclay
Dental implants are for everyone. ILZ Mini Southern Implants offer an economic and simple solution for denture retention for the elderly patient.
Catalogues and Brochures
Instructions for Use (IFU)
Documents
Videos and Animations
 |
 |
| Caption | Caption |
References
Van Staden RC, Guan H, Loo Y, Johnson NW, Nel M. Comparative analysis of internal and external-hex crown connection systems – a finite element study. J. Biomedical Science and Engineering, 2008, 1, 10-14.
Ribeiro CG, Maia MLC, Scherrer SS, Cardoso AC, Wiskott HWA. Resistance of three implant-abutment interfaces to fatigue testing. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010, 413-420.
Zembic A, Kim S, Zwahlen M, Kelly JR. Systematic Review of the Survival Rate and Incidence of Biologic, Technical, and Esthetic Complications of Single Implant Abutments Supporting Fixed Prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29(SUPPL):99-116. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g2.2.
English
French
German
Greek
Italian
Portuguese
Spanish
Swedish